Can Spouses Be Forced to Testify Against Each Other in Oklahoma?

Dustin Compton
Connect with me
AV Rated Trial Lawyer

Can Spouses Be Forced to Testify Against Each Other in Oklahoma?

The concept of spousal privilege is a common device on soap operas. Typically, one spouse will commit a crime, and the other will refuse to testify, citing “spousal privilege.” But does a privilege really exist in Oklahoma which permits spouses to refuse to testify against each other? The answer is a qualified yes.

What is the Purpose of the Spousal Privilege?

Marriage is a constitutional right and the center of the right to privacy. Many cases interpreting the right to privacy revolve specifically around the rights of married people as sacrosanct. In 1888, the Supreme Court described marriage as fundamental, “the most important relation in life [and has] more to do with the morals and civilization of a people than any other institution.” See Maynard v. Hill. In 1942, in Skinner v. State of Okl. ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), the Court further emphasized the importance of marriage, stating that marriage is “one of the basic civil rights of man.

The marital privilege is part and parcel of that sanctity. The spousal privilege is an evidentiary privilege which provides an exception to the admissibility of evidence. Generally, communications made to a spouse during the marriage are confidential. So long as the communication is confidential - i.e. not made publicly or in the presence of third parties - neither spouse can be made to testify in court about what was said. The privilege only extends to communications made during the marriage, not before or after.

Oklahoma recognizes privileges for statements made to one’s spouse, including the right to prevent one’s spouse from testifying as to any confidential communication between the accused and the spouse.

Oklahoma law states:

A. A communication is confidential for purposes of this section if it is made privately by any person to the person’s spouse and is not intended for disclosure to any other person.

B. An accused in a criminal proceeding has a privilege to prevent the spouse of the accused from testifying as to any confidential communication between the accused and the spouse.

C. The privilege may be claimed by the accused or by the spouse on behalf of the accused. The authority of the spouse to do so is presumed.

D. There is no privilege under this section in a proceeding in which one spouse is charged with a crime against the person or property of:

1. The other;

2. A child of either;

3. A person residing in the household of either; or

4. A third person when the crime is committed in the course of committing a crime against any other person named in this section.

See OK Stat § 12-2504 (2014).

Oklahoma follows the modern trend of limiting the extension of marital privilege to crimes or civil action by one spouse against the other, crimes against the children of either spouse, or to a third party injured during the commission of a crime against the other spouse or a child. This means that one spouse cannot commit battery against the other, for example, and then stop the victim spouse from testifying about the crime.

The spousal privilege is not available in civil cases.

The Spousal Privilege May Be Waived

There have been very few published cases about spousal privilege in Oklahoma law, but subject matter waiver is recognized in the state. Waiver occurs when there has been a voluntary disclosure is of any significant part of the privileged matter. Oklahoma uses a totality of the circumstances approach to determine when one party’s disclosure of privileged communications means he or she has waived the privilege altogether. The bottom line is that a person waives the privilege if he or she voluntarily discloses or consents to disclosure of any "significant" part of the privileged matter.

The courts examine all of the circumstances surrounding the communications. In the Oklahoma case of Hogan v. State, 2006 OK CR 19, the defendant was accused of murdering a woman who babysat for his children. Shortly after the woman’s death, he asked his wife to lie and give him an alibi, tell the police he was at home with her on that day and that he cut his hand in the garage. Hogan used this untrue alibi in his statement to police. At his trial, the judge ruled that he had waived spousal privilege by disclosing a significant part of the conversation, i.e. by disclosing an untrue alibi, which was a significant part of the confidential conversation he had had with his wife. Hogan was convicted, and the appeals court held the trial court did not err in admitting the wife’s testimony about the conversation.

Call an Experienced Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyer if You Are Under Investigation

If you are under criminal investigation and have shared information with your spouse, it is imperative that you speak with a qualified Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer right away. Any communication you make with police may waive the privilege.

Get in touch with our lawyers to speak by calling 405-542-2529 (542-CLAW) and one of our attorneys will speak with you about the circumstances of your case.  Read more about our team, or continue reading and researching our free legal information library, or enter live chat.

Be the first to comment!
Post a Comment